Provocative Business and Data Consulting Solutions

Tell the Vendor what you Need

A businesswoman shouting at the world through a megaphone NEOS

When system selection teams start looking for a core system, they often fear that they will select the wrong solution and cost the company lots of money with little payback. They will be enchanted by a vendor’s marketing skills and miss key information. To compensate, the selection team may hold back from vendors, believing that keeping the vendor more in the dark will make the vendor more truthful. In fact, doing this makes it harder for the vendor to effectively describe and differentiate their solution. It also makes it harder for the selection team to understand how solution meets their needs. It is much better to give vendors a detailed description of the business/IT problem you are trying to solve and rely on other best practices to sniff out vendor puffery.

How does this work exactly? Follow these 3 principles to write an effective RFP.

  1. Describe your initiative in detail.

    Instead of simply stating that you need a policy administration system for annuity products, give the vendor details. Tell potential suppliers the details they need to craft a solution such as:

    • Key functionality you expect them to cover (electronic forms, interactions with the licensing system, new business compliance, call center support, etc.).
    • Long term goals for future products or new innovative functionality.
    • Challenges with existing systems such as poor speed to market or legacy characteristics.
    • Top system characteristics including speed to market requirements, access to data needs, or business rules engine.
  1. Be specific about requirements.

    Ask questions that define the detail such as, “How are new application forms added to the system for each state,” rather than “How are new forms added?”

  1. Ask open-ended questions.

    For example, “How does your system handle variable subaccounts,” rather than simply yes or no questions. Then make sure you leave room in the response form for a longer (4 or 5 sentence) response.

It is important to keep in mind that the vendor will absolutely put their best foot forward when they respond to these questions and will likely include some puffery in their response. But once you have their initial response, it is your responsibility to now verify and validate the information to distinguish between actual and aspirational capabilities. Vendor demonstrations, conversations with references, system reviews, and proofs of concept will allow you to assess and revise vendor scores to make sure you understand the strengths and weaknesses of the platform.

For more information read the full whitepaper – Dazed and Confused by System Selection

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to blogs via email

Enter your email address to receive new blog posts from NEOS via email.
Copyright 2014 NEOS LLC